| Home | About us | Methodology | Testimonials | Working Examples | Resources | Video Demo's | Making It Happen | Pricing | Contacts | Secure Section |
|
|
THE MOST
INTELLIGENT, AFFORDABLE GRAFFITI & CRIME TRACKING POSSIBLE |
|
What is GRIP and who created it? |
GRIP was designed and implemented after many years speaking to frustrated cities, Police and other abatement groups in several countries on the problems associated with lack of data, lack of sharing information and generally the need for something better than what was available. Originally designed for our Tripwire camera users to find hotspots and identify serial graffiti offenders, it become known that there was a greater need for many frustrated cities and their Police departments. We
realized that there was a lack of easily afforded highly functional
sharing platforms geared for not only graffiti but a host of city
issues and determined to make something that suits rail, city,
police and others, we decided to commit to the system. Why bother with a
database, the offenders if caught usually get off with little
repercussions? It needs to be recognized that in the cases where serial younger offenders have been caught but let off with little penalty that the experience of court and cost has been enough to simply make the offender cease. It needs to be realized that one offender being caught and dealt with can lead to a domino effect that can quickly stop graffiti incidents among their associates also. We have seen countless examples where one offender being caught has lead to the detention of dozens through general “saving ones self” mentality. Sure there are those who don’t however we have witnessed many incidents where offenders who have caused hundreds of thousands in damage and been released have stopped and never re-offended. Although let off, the win to the cit in simply not having that offender continue their damaging ways should be satisfaction enough. Cases in the United states similarly see younger offenders slip through court processes however there is an upsurge in District Attorneys mounting civil action instantly against the offenders and parents and having an order against them with 100% success. Those who cannot pay often have a lien placed against their homes to see the debt to the city paid in full. A win whether it be
criminal, financial or where offenders cease should all be
considered serious wins against this ongoing damage. A city
realizing the long term saving by having an offender cease will soon
recognize that the legal process although apparently flawed can
generate a positive financial gain in both short and long term. How is it different from
the other server based graffiti systems we have seen? We also allow the city to take control of the costs by doing their own data entry if they wish. By doing this they can harvest as much or as little information as they want and take control of every aspect of the process. Instead of paying
$12-40,000 per year you would only pay
$2,000.00 for a stronger
management system. But other systems do all
the analysis for us? As you will see with all
the additional features GRIP offers you, it will bring a whole new
reason to do things in house with not only graffiti abatement but
also code enforcement, sanitation being involved. But we just take the
photo and that’s all we need to do. For those who wish, we can offer either full data entry and analysis through to simple and occasional graffiti reading assistance if required. A simple rate for data entry and analysis would be charged to the client based on the time associated if this is their preferred method of operation. Even if we provide this your costs comparatively would be a pittance. We must stress that to keep
costs down we encourage cities to take on their own role and realize
that taking in the information via their contractors is a simple
much better way, given the sheer diversity of information that can
be harvested. Why is GRIP so cheap?
Current systems are so over
priced that only a small handful can afford it. This prevents many
from participating and getting the full potential from shared
offender information systems structured this way. It uses GPS but doesn’t
need GPS mapping cameras? It sounds like a lot of
man hours and work to make this happen? It may take them a few
seconds more if you ask them to look for or write down other
relevant information such as evidence of drug use, vandalism,
sanitation, truancy and so on. You must consider that these people
are out anyway and taking information in, its just a better way of
doing it with a very powerful end result. Little extra time
required. What about data entry
how long will that take? Why is it even better to
have neighboring cities involved? Imagine you have an offender who you think is worth $10,000 in damage to you. Knowing no city limits they are most likely worth an additional $30,000 to your closest neighbors. Police and the DA or prosecutors have a much larger chance and offence list with multiple cities on board. Also, if your offender is
caught in one of the other cities, the Police will identify on their
search that they are also wanted in your city. It works both ways. Can rail or schools be
involved? We have packaged a multi
agency city package that allows for 4 separate entities to be on
board immediately within your city. The city, Parks, DOT and School
district can all be involved from day one. Can the Police do the
data entry instead of the city? Anyone can be responsible for the data entry. We suggest though that the city be the controlling entity as they can harvest more information other than graffiti that’s of importance to it such as sanitation, vandalism and so on. Some States or countries
may prefer to use it only as a Police database and that’s fine. The
only down side would be that the city is normally the one resourced
to take the images and gather information. They also stand to gain
by the features within GRIP such as monthly removal reports,
abatement contractors performance and so on which is of interest to
the city. How do the Police
interact with the database? We have designed a special page just for police so they can nominate an offender of interest and create a special page just for them. It can contain a vast amount of information only visible to that officer such as address, past offences, probation details, web site addresses such as you tube, my space, graffiti websites and other investigative items. It allows Police to add
information in an ongoing investigation at will, on the fly and be
able to refer back to it as they gather additional information. Can the mapping be used
for other special projects? Some examples may
include… From that they may be able
to establish an insight into the offenders approximate location or
likely next targets. Over time we will look to
use the GRIP site as a value added resource that will offer other
materials, worth while links and other materials. What’s the school survey
form for? The survey we suggest is put out to a cities school population heads or principals and asks for their information on their own graffiti and anti social behavior issues. Its asks the important
relevant questions but more importantly asks them to be involved and
ask teachers through to janitorial staff for known tags they see
regularly on everything from lockers, to buildings and even books.
The purpose of this is to quickly allow police to identify if their
worst offenders are of school age. We have seen very quick results
where schools have identified a correlation, known the offenders
age, classroom and locker for quick interaction. What if we think its too
difficult to self manage graffiti information ourselves? GRIP is designed to allow
you to register partial tags, symbol graffiti, gang type graffiti
and so on so should something be unreadable or traditionally
searched by alphanumeric traditional means, you can do so with GRIP.
Also should something be too difficult it can be flagged for later
review so it is filed for later scrutiny. Are their any hidden
charges?
|